← Chicken Color Standards

Brown (eb) vs Wheaten (EWh)

Same Columbian markings, same buff body — two different Extension bases, with real breeding consequences

Two chickens can carry completely different Extension-locus (E) genotypes and still look almost identical — a buff body with black Columbian markings, in this case. This page walks through exactly that case: eb (Brown) and EWh (Wheaten) both build a "Buff Black Columbian" bird, but they are not the same base, and once you cross them the difference stops being cosmetic. For the wider allele series, see the Genetics Guide.
Buff Columbian chick with a dark cap over cream-buff down.
A Buff Columbian chick built on the eb (Brown) base — see below for what an EWh-based bird of the same name would need instead.

Two bases, one silhouette

Both varieties below are called some form of "Buff Black Columbian": a buff/gold body with black confined to the neck, tail and wing tips by the Columbian gene. But the base each is built on is different, and the genotype required to get a fully clean body is different too:

eb (Brown) baseEWh (Wheaten) base
Extension genotypeeb/ebEWh/EWh
ColumbianCo/CoCo/Co
Pattern gene needed for a clean body?Yes — Pg/Pg as well, or pencilling ghosts persistNo — Columbian alone is enough
UndercolourGreyBuff

The undercolour is the one field-checkable difference that survives on the outside of an otherwise identical-looking bird: lift a body feather, and grey underneath means eb, buff (not grey) means EWh. Everything else — the buff ground, the black hackle/tail/wing-tip markings, the overall Columbian silhouette — can look the same either way.

Why they can look the same at all

The Extension locus has a whole series of alleles, not just two, ranked in a dominance order:

E > eR > EWh > eb > e+

EWh (Wheaten) sits above eb (Brown) in that order, and both start out as gold/buff-ground bases with black confined by nature to the extremities rather than spread over the body — which is exactly the raw material the Columbian gene needs to work with. Columbian's own job (restrict black to hackle, tail and wing tips) is largely the same operation on either base, so the finished silhouette converges even though the two starting alleles are not the same allele, and are not even close together in the dominance order.

Where it stops being cosmetic: crossing the two

The dominance order above is not just trivia — it decides what a cross between the two bases actually produces, and it is where a breeder who has only compared the two by eye can get a real surprise:

Cross an eb-based Buff Columbian with an EWh-based one, and every single F1 chick shows the EWh phenotype. Because EWh is dominant over eb, an eb/EWh chick looks like the simpler, Wheaten-based parent — buff undercolour, no need for Pg to keep the body clean — while quietly carrying a hidden eb allele that contributes nothing visible to this generation at all.

The consequences show up a generation later, not immediately:

None of this is unique to Buff Columbian — it is a general property of the Extension allele series, worked through here with one concrete pair because the resemblance is so close it makes the point vivid. Any two varieties built on adjacent E-series alleles with a similar-acting modifier layered on top can converge the same way.

Related

Check your own pair directly with the Compare tool, or run the actual cross — including what shows up in F2 — in Breeding Outcomes.

References & notes
  1. Extension (E) allele series and dominance order (E > eR > EWh > eb > e+): Smyth JR Jr (1990) Genetics of plumage, skin and eye pigmentation in chickens, in Crawford RD (ed.) Poultry Breeding and Genetics, Elsevier — see the Genetics Guide references for the full citation and allele table.
Try it: plan an eb × EWh cross · compare the two bases directly · see Buff Columbian